Individual Calculations February 2020
 Rezniks, Roberts  Total change: 122.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Latvian 2020 Championship chess Quarterfinal Riga LAT 2020-01-03
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1269 1112 2.50 7 0.32 40 12.80 
  Francs, Marats 1512  * LAT0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Tihomirovs, Andris 1378 LAT0.001-0.1840-7.20 
  Platonovs, Nikolajs 1251 LAT0.001-0.3140-12.40 
  Napins, Vadims 1307 LAT0.001-0.2540-10.00 
  Yovanovich, Victor 1172 LAT0.5010.08403.20 
  Rupais, Gustavs 1120 LAT1.0010.514020.40 
  Tolmacevs, Romans 1145 LAT1.0010.554022.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Maskachka Open 2020 amateurs to 1600 Riga LAT 2020-01-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1378 1112 4.00 7 2.73 40 109.20 
  Hermanis, Atis 1359 LAT0.001-0.1940-7.60 
  Vizulis, Alfreds 1281 LAT1.0010.724028.80 
  Antjufejevs, Vsevolods 1330 LAT1.0010.784031.20 
  Spirkova, Marija 1392 LAT0.001-0.1640-6.40 
  Burenkovs, Dmitrijs 1418 LAT0.5010.364014.40 
  Ovcinkins, Arsenijs 1512  * LAT1.0010.924036.80 
  Pomahs, Ziedonis 1356 LAT0.5010.304012.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office