Individual Calculations July 2011
 Tvarijonas, Tomas  Total change: 77.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Lithuanian chess championship 2011 Nemencine LTU 2011-04-25
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2187 1929 5.00 8 3.26 15 48.90 
  Laurusas, Tomas 2299 LTU0.001-0.1015-1.50 
  Sutkevicius, Juozas 2148 LTU1.0010.781511.70 
  Zukauskas, Petras 1823 LTU1.0010.36155.40 
  Malisauskas, Vidmantas g2329  * LTU0.5010.42156.30 
  Sakalauskas, Vaidas m2329  * LTU0.5010.42156.30 
  Setkauskas, Vaidas 2236 LTU1.0010.861512.90 
  Klabis, Rokas 2004 LTU1.0010.60159.00 
  Sarakauskas, Gediminas m2329  * LTU0.001-0.0815-1.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Baltija Cup 2011 festival Palanga LTU 2011-06-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2119 1915 3.50 6 1.90 15 28.50 
  Kasparavicius, Laimutis 2113 LTU1.0010.761511.40 
  Bieliauskas, Marius 2121 LTU0.5010.26153.90 
  Rogule, Laura wg2315  * LAT1.0010.921513.80 
  Juknis, Paulius 2112 LTU0.001-0.2515-3.75 
  Krustkalns, Kristaps f2270 LAT0.001-0.1115-1.65 
  Lepeskaite, Migle 1783 LTU1.0010.32154.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office