Individual Calculations March 2011
 Matveeva, Olga  Total change: -25.35  Rating chartPersonal card
 PriFR Chmp. 2011 womens Perm RUS 2011-01-04
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2017 2215 6.00 9 -0.66 15 -9.90 
  Tiunova, Anna 1861 RUS1.0010.11151.65 
  Grebennikova, Tatyana 1981 RUS0.501-0.2915-4.35 
  Akhmetova, Karina 2006 RUS1.0010.23153.45 
  Uljianova, Nadezhda wf2028 RUS0.501-0.2415-3.60 
  Severiukhina, Zoja wm2312 RUS0.001-0.3715-5.55 
  Makarenko, Alexandra 1931 RUS1.0010.16152.40 
  Mustafina, Svetlana 1920 RUS1.0010.15152.25 
  Karavaeva, Nadezhda 1979 RUS0.501-0.3015-4.50 
  Demina, Marya 2133 RUS0.501-0.1115-1.65 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Moscow open 2011 D Moscow RUS 2011-01-29
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2081 2215 5.00 9 -1.03 15 -15.45 
  Fyodorova, Irina 1951 RUS1.0010.18152.70 
  Smirnova, Anastasia 2021 RUS0.501-0.2515-3.75 
  Imeeva, Aisa 2043 RUS1.0010.27154.05 
  Saulina, Varvara wf2280 RUS1.0010.59158.85 
  Dogodkina, Julia 2070 RUS0.001-0.6915-10.35 
  Yarullina, Alina 2047 RUS0.501-0.2215-3.30 
  Vasilevich, Irina mwg2327 RUS0.001-0.3515-5.25 
  Lysenko, Maria 2006 RUS0.501-0.2715-4.05 
  Grebennikova, Tatyana 1981 RUS0.501-0.2915-4.35 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office