Individual Calculations September 2011
 Yuffa, Daniil  Total change: 76.35  Rating chartPersonal card
 Czech Open 2011 - A - GM open Pardubice CZE 2011-07-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2414 2301 5.50 9 2.36 15 35.40 
  Sengupta, Deep g2563 IND1.0010.821512.30 
  Andreev, Eduard g2458 UKR0.001-0.2915-4.35 
  Hampel, Felix 2049 GER1.0010.19152.85 
  Gonzalez Menendez, Ivan f2448 ESP0.5010.20153.00 
  Talla, Vladimir g2427 CZE0.5010.17152.55 
  Potapov, Alexander g2418 RUS1.0010.66159.90 
  Rasik, Vitezslav m2475 CZE0.5010.23153.45 
  Neuman, Petr m2454 CZE0.5010.20153.00 
  Bodnaruk, Anastasia mwg2431 RUS0.5010.18152.70 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Olomouc Chess Summer 2011 - B1 - IM tournament Olomouc CZE 2011-08-03
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2276 2301 7.50 9 2.73 15 40.95 
  Wiley, Tom E f2306 ENG0.001-0.4915-7.35 
  Obsivac, Josef f2273 CZE1.0010.46156.90 
  Poznanska, Katarzyna 2068 POL1.0010.21153.15 
  Jurek, Josef m2324 CZE1.0010.53157.95 
  Dmitrenko, Viktor m2353 UKR1.0010.57158.55 
  Moritz, Aron 2091 GER1.0010.23153.45 
  Furman, Boris f2262 RUS1.0010.45156.75 
  Stachanczyk, Jacek 2328 POL1.0010.54158.10 
  Biolek, Richard m2478 CZE0.5010.23153.45 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office