Individual Calculations December 2016
 Luque Saiz, Andres  Total change: 193.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 IV Sub-2200 Burjassot BURJASSOT ESP 2016-09-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1679 1523 4.00 7 1.76 40 70.40 
  Cebrian Martinez, Antonio 1923  * ESP0.5010.424016.80 
  Gonzalez Terol, Enrique 1894 ESP0.5010.404016.00 
  Rios Garcia, Gabino 1746 ESP0.001-0.2240-8.80 
  Soto Soriano, Eugenio 1247 ESP1.0010.17406.80 
  Martinez Robles, Pablo Javier 1589 ESP0.5010.09403.60 
  Gimenez Sanchis, Jose Antonio 1633 ESP0.5010.15406.00 
  Gil Pou, Jose Luis 1719 ESP1.0010.754030.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Cto. Provincial Individual Primera, Valencia 2016 Valencia ESP 2016-10-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1806 1625 5.00 7 3.08 40 123.20 
  Esteban Hernandez, Eusebio 1803 ESP0.5010.23409.20 
  Pareja Mohorte, Francisco Jose 1868 ESP1.0010.804032.00 
  Pedrero Gil, Francisco 1779 ESP0.5010.21408.40 
  Esteller Nadal, Miguel 1706 ESP0.5010.11404.40 
  Nieto Tornero, Jose 1962 ESP1.0010.884035.20 
  Guillot Garcia, Antonio 1861 ESP0.5010.304012.00 
  Soliva Ruiz, Ramon 1662 ESP1.0010.554022.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office