Individual Calculations September 2019
 Humburg, Philipp  Total change: -33.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 Riga Technical University Open 2019 - Tournament A Riga LAT 2019-08-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2226 2256 4.00 9 -0.60 20 -12.00 
  Horobrijs, Daniils 1856  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Gretarsson, Helgi Ass g2412 ISL0.001-0.2920-5.80 
  Mieze, Natalja 1856  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Siddharth, Jagadeesh f2382 SGP1.0010.672013.40 
  Mammadzada, Gunay mwg2425 AZE0.001-0.2820-5.60 
  Baum, Jonasz f2358 POL1.0010.642012.80 
  Tania, Sachdev mwg2400 IND0.001-0.3120-6.20 
  Sinz, Bernhard f2343 GER0.001-0.3820-7.60 
  Batashevs, Arsens 2004 LAT0.001-0.8120-16.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Vienna Chess Open A Vienna AUT 2019-08-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2087 2256 4.00 7 -1.06 20 -21.20 
  Halas, Julia 2036 GER0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Gratze, Michael 2037 AUT0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Chan, James 2067 CAN0.501-0.2520-5.00 
  Moreto Quintana, Alex 2092 ESP1.0010.28205.60 
  Li, Zhenyu 2129 CHN0.501-0.1720-3.40 
  Hupfer, Robert 2133 AUT0.001-0.6720-13.40 
  Schulze, Andreas 2116 GER1.0010.31206.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office