Individual Calculations January 2018
 Nihal, Sarin  Total change: 17.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 9th CSC London Chess Classic: FIDE Open London ENG 2017-12-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2416 2507 6.50 9 1.06 10 10.60 
  Peters, Stephen G 2107  * ENG1.0010.08100.80 
  Yuan, Yuanling wm2243 CAN1.0010.18101.80 
  Houska, Jovanka mwg2407 ENG1.0010.36103.60 
  Bates, Richard A m2378 ENG1.0010.33103.30 
  Melkumyan, Hrant g2633 ARM0.001-0.3310-3.30 
  Raja, Harshit m2420 IND1.0010.38103.80 
  Moussard, Jules g2576 FRA0.5010.10101.00 
  Cornette, Matthieu g2606 FRA0.5010.14101.40 
  Gumularz, Szymon f2376 POL0.501-0.1810-1.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 WORLD YOUTH U-16 CHESS OLYMPIAD 2017 Gujarat IND 2017-12-10
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2355 2507 5.50 7 0.64 10 6.40 
  Dedebas, Emre Emin f2258 TUR0.501-0.3110-3.10 
  Mirzoyan, David f2345 ARM1.0010.29102.90 
  Gaifullin, Artur f2417 RUS0.501-0.1210-1.20 
  Gholami, Aryan m2499 IRI1.0010.49104.90 
  Erigaisi, Arjun f2359 IND0.501-0.2010-2.00 
  Saydaliev, Saidakbar 2362 UZB1.0010.31103.10 
  Zhalmakhanov, Ramazan f2245 KAZ1.0010.18101.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office