Rapid: Individual Calculations December 2017
 Voronin, Nikita  Total change: -9.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Rapid Moscow. November 2017 - 3 Moscow RUS 2017-11-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1650 1466 2.00 7 -0.22 20 -4.40 
  Maslyanskiy, Aleksandr 1866  * RUS0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Uzunov, Jakov 1841 RUS0.001-0.0920-1.80 
  Martyanov, Nikita 1404 RUS0.001-0.5920-11.80 
  Plavinskiy, Albert 1380 RUS1.0010.38207.60 
  Kondratenko, Anatoly 1866  * RUS0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Baunov, Yury 1330 RUS1.0010.32206.40 
  Losev, Dmitry m1866  * RUS0.001-0.0820-1.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Rapid Moscow. November 2017 - 4 Moscow RUS 2017-11-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1678 1466 1.50 7 -0.23 20 -4.60 
  Gilyazitdinov, Nikita 1866  * RUS0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Egger, Abraham 1713 SUI1.0010.812016.20 
  Travin, Vladimir 1792 RUS0.001-0.1320-2.60 
  Shmatkov, Mikhail 1692 RUS0.001-0.2120-4.20 
  Zhuravlev, Mikhail 1620 RUS0.5010.21204.20 
  Tarasenko, Vitalij 1533 RUS0.001-0.4120-8.20 
  Naumova, Alexandra 1527 RUS0.001-0.4220-8.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office