Individual Calculations September 2009
 Faibisovich, Vadim  Total change: -15.10  Rating chartPersonal card
 Czech Open 2009 J - Infinity Open Pardubice CZE 2009-07-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2218 2429 5.50 7 0.31 10 3.10 
  Zoubek, David 2029  * CZE1.0010.08100.80 
  Chernyshova, Natalia 2029  * RUS1.0010.08100.80 
  Strekalovsky, Viktor 2147 RUS1.0010.16101.60 
  Chetverik, Maxim m2354 RUS0.501-0.1010-1.00 
  Gergel, Volodymar f2316 UKR0.501-0.1510-1.50 
  Hansch, Thorsten c2203 GER1.0010.21102.10 
  Stupak, Kirill m2449 BLR0.5010.03100.30 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Czech Open 2009 A - Pardubice Open Pardubice CZE 2009-07-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2276 2429 4.50 9 -1.82 10 -18.20 
  Korennoi, Viktor 2247 RUS1.0010.26102.60 
  Vrana, Jan 2236 CZE1.0010.25102.50 
  Biolek-Jun., Richard m2361 CZE0.001-0.5910-5.90 
  Jurcik, Martin f2317 SVK0.501-0.1510-1.50 
  Shytaj, Carlo 2223 ITA0.501-0.2610-2.60 
  Lammers, Markus 2297 GER0.001-0.6810-6.80 
  Raykhman, Alexander 2274 GER0.001-0.7110-7.10 
  Molnar, Peter f2264 SVK0.501-0.2210-2.20 
  Zhuravleva, Olga 2262 RUS1.0010.28102.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office