Individual Calculations May 2011
 Narayanan, Srinath  Total change: 26.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 First Saturday GM March 2011 Budapest HUN 2011-03-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2404 2310 4.00 9 0.60 10 6.00 
  Kislik, Erik Andrew f2319 USA0.5010.01100.10 
  Mirzoev, Azer g2571 AZE0.5010.32103.20 
  Natsidis, Christoph f2329 GER1.0010.53105.30 
  Vajda, Levente g2508 ROU0.001-0.2410-2.40 
  Goh, Wei Ming Kevin m2382 SIN0.001-0.4010-4.00 
  Womacka, Mathias g2475 GER0.001-0.2810-2.80 
  Carlstedt, Jonathan 2386 GER1.0010.60106.00 
  Szablowski, Pawel 2404 POL0.5010.13101.30 
  Neubronner, Jarred c2262 SIN0.501-0.0710-0.70 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Caissa GM March 2011 Kecskemet HUN 2011-03-19
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2402 2310 5.50 9 2.06 10 20.60 
  Antal, Tibor Kende 2291 HUN0.501-0.0310-0.30 
  Mihok, Oliver m2462 HUN1.0010.70107.00 
  Sax, Gyula g2525 HUN0.5010.27102.70 
  Goh, Wei Ming Kevin m2382 SIN0.5010.10101.00 
  Kislik, Erik Andrew f2319 USA0.5010.01100.10 
  Groszpeter, Attila g2525 HUN0.5010.27102.70 
  Natsidis, Christoph f2329 GER1.0010.53105.30 
  Sarosi, Zoltan m2313 HUN0.001-0.5010-5.00 
  Ilincic, Zlatko g2471 SRB1.0010.71107.10 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back


Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office