Rapid: Individual Calculations July 2022
 Chomczyk, Marek  Total change: -72.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 XXXI Turniej o Puchar Kawki (FIDE) Warszawa POL 2022-06-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1756 2139 5.50 7 -0.53 20 -10.60 
  Branicki, Slawomir 1739  * POL1.0010.08201.60 
  Urbaniak, Karol 1561 POL1.0010.02200.40 
  Szyler, Bartosz 1797 POL1.0010.12202.40 
  Celinski, Kamil 1861 POL0.001-0.8320-16.60 
  Flis, Piotr 1466 POL1.0010.01200.20 
  Przedmojski, Rafal 2135 POL0.501-0.0120-0.20 
  Bartodziej, Bartosz 1734 POL1.0010.08201.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 XXXIV Turniej o Puchar Kawki (FIDE) Warszawa POL 2022-06-26
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1645 2139 3.50 7 -3.08 20 -61.60 
  Wieckowski, Jakub 1739  * POL1.0010.08201.60 
  Gajewski, Dariusz 1656 POL1.0010.05201.00 
  Harazinska, Magdalena wf1781 POL0.001-0.9020-18.00 
  Zbrzeski, Piotr 1722 POL1.0010.07201.40 
  Sacharewicz, Krzysztof 1765 POL0.001-0.9020-18.00 
  Branicki, Slawomir 1412 POL0.001-0.9920-19.80 
  Wieckowski, Kamil 1438 POL0.501-0.4920-9.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office