Individual Calculations September 2011
 Karwowski, Kacper  Total change: 28.35  Rating chartPersonal card
 Miedzynarodowy Festiwal Szachowy - MieleƱska Perla - Open B Lazy POL 2011-06-25
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1908 1729 4.00 7 2.14 15 32.10 
  Prazmowski, Bartosz 1891 POL1.0010.711510.65 
  Darowicki, Mariusz 1910 POL1.0010.741511.10 
  Eggink, Ryszard 1905 POL0.001-0.2715-4.05 
  Ciechonski, Piotr 1888 POL0.5010.21153.15 
  Malinowski, Damian 1900 POL1.0010.731510.95 
  Poswiatowski, Michal 1970 POL0.001-0.2015-3.00 
  Korcz, Daniel 1893 POL0.5010.22153.30 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Miguel Najdorf International Chess Festival - Open B Warsaw POL 2011-07-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1694 1729 4.00 8 -0.25 15 -3.75 
  Zochowski, Kacper 1954 POL0.5010.28154.20 
  Pekacki, Stanislaw 1927 POL0.001-0.2415-3.60 
  Murawko, Julia 1557 POL0.001-0.7315-10.95 
  Wrzesinski, Gustaw 1329  * POL1.0010.08151.20 
  Janus, Tomasz 1518 POL1.0010.23153.45 
  Sacharewicz, Krzysztof 1468 POL1.0010.18152.70 
  Prazmowski, Bartosz 1919 POL0.5010.25153.75 
  Malaczek, Mateusz 1879 POL0.001-0.3015-4.50 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office