Individual Calculations July 2012
 Rak, Tomasz  Total change: 8.70  Rating chartPersonal card
 Mistrzostwa Olsztyna w szachach klasycznych 2012 Olsztyn POL 2012-05-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1791 2051 4.50 7 -0.94 15 -14.10 
  Kotlewski, Lukasz 1671 POL0.001-0.9115-13.65 
  Wojtunik, Maciej 1651  * POL1.0010.08151.20 
  Budrewicz, Krzysztof 2223 POL0.001-0.2715-4.05 
  Czarkowski, Tomasz 1651  * POL1.0010.08151.20 
  Adamowicz, Piotr 1651  * POL1.0010.08151.20 
  Renkowski, Piotr 1945 POL0.501-0.1415-2.10 
  Baran, Dawid 1748 POL1.0010.14152.10 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 54 OGÓLNOPOLSKI TURNIEJ SZACHOWY O "Z£OT¡ WIE¯Ê" - FINA£ CENTRALNY Olkusz POL 2012-06-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2099 2051 5.00 8 1.52 15 22.80 
  Lewtak, Damian 2183 POL0.001-0.3215-4.80 
  Szydelko, Kazimierz 1878 POL1.0010.27154.05 
  Siembab, Bartosz 2295 POL1.0010.801512.00 
  Kirszenstein, Adam 2104 POL0.5010.07151.05 
  Krajewska, Aleksandra 1743 POL1.0010.14152.10 
  Olszewski, Andrzej 2280 POL1.0010.791511.85 
  Kowalczuk, Wojciech 2220 POL0.001-0.2815-4.20 
  Rusiniak, Slawomir 2090 POL0.5010.05150.75 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office