Rapid: Individual Calculations April 2015
 Malinowski, Damian  Total change: 15.80  Rating chartPersonal card
 Grand Prix Polonii Wroclaw - 13.03.2015 Wroclaw POL 2015-03-13
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2033 1874 2.50 7 0.20 20 4.00 
  Swicarz, Maciej 2274  * POL0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Rutkowski, Bartlomiej 1658 POL1.0010.22204.40 
  Wieczorek, Oskar m2274  * POL0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Motyl, Tomasz 1961 POL0.5010.12202.40 
  Chrzanowski, Michal 1867 POL1.0010.49209.80 
  Kubien, Jerzy f2215 POL0.001-0.1220-2.40 
  Galinski, Jaroslaw 1981 POL0.001-0.3520-7.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Grand Prix Polonii Wroclaw - 20.03.2015 Wroclaw POL 2015-03-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1963 1874 3.50 7 0.59 20 11.80 
  Wieczorek, Oskar m2274  * POL0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Antczak, Marcin 1649 POL0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  White, John 1880 USA0.5010.01200.20 
  Rutkowski, Bartlomiej 1658 POL0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Stecki, Witold 2163 POL1.0010.842016.80 
  Stelmaszuk, Maciej 1846 POL1.0010.46209.20 
  Swicarz, Maciej 2274  * POL0.001-0.0820-1.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office