Individual Calculations September 2012
 Lizak, Jakub  Total change: 64.95  Rating chartPersonal card
 DMP II Liga Juniorow Borowice POL 2012-07-21
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1614 1782 7.00 8 1.28 15 19.20 
  Chylewski, Patryk 1571 POL1.0010.23153.45 
  Lisowski, Adam 1618 POL1.0010.28154.20 
  Adamczewski, Maciej 1742 POL1.0010.44156.60 
  Beczala, Pawel 1732 POL1.0010.43156.45 
  Pilzak, Marcin 1627 POL1.0010.29154.35 
  Gondro, Kacper 1514 POL1.0010.17152.55 
  Kubicka, Anna 1642 POL0.001-0.6915-10.35 
  Pasieka, Marcin 1464 POL1.0010.13151.95 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 48. MFSz im. A.Rubinsteina grupa B Polanica Zdroj POL 2012-08-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2087 1793 4.50 9 3.05 15 45.75 
  Suliborski, Jakub 2013 POL0.5010.28154.20 
  Kedzierski, Slawomir 2101 POL1.0010.861512.90 
  Goluch, Piotr 2193  * POL0.5010.42156.30 
  Sycz, Dariusz 1991 POL0.5010.26153.90 
  Leczycki, Pawel 2038 POL1.0010.801512.00 
  Mroziak, Maciej 2193  * POL0.5010.42156.30 
  Kaczorowski, Piotr 2116 POL0.001-0.1315-1.95 
  Panas, Pawel 2175 POL0.001-0.0915-1.35 
  Mucha, Piotr 1965 POL0.5010.23153.45 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office