Rapid: Individual Calculations March 2017
 Krustkalns, Kristaps  Total change: 9.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 GM Gipslis memorial-2017 Riga LAT 2017-02-11
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2207 2202 4.50 8 0.62 20 12.40 
  Lacis, Aleksandrs 1802  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Bernotas, Arturs f2414 LAT1.0010.772015.40 
  Sveshnikov, Evgeny g2441 RUS0.5010.30206.00 
  Berzinsh, Roland m2380 LAT0.001-0.2720-5.40 
  Bolsakovs, Vadims 2030 LAT0.501-0.2320-4.60 
  Agafonov, Yuri 2191 LAT0.501-0.0220-0.40 
  Petrovskis, Olegs 2129 LAT1.0010.40208.00 
  Tokranovs, Dmitrijs 2270 LAT0.001-0.4120-8.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Latvian Championship Vidzeme Regional Qualifier 2017 Sigulda LAT 2017-02-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2030 2202 4.00 6 -0.16 20 -3.20 
  Bogorods, Daniels 1802  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Gercans, Visvaldis 1939 LAT0.501-0.3220-6.40 
  Golubovskis, Maksims 1878 LAT1.0010.13202.60 
  Kretainis, Kristaps 2242 LAT0.5010.06201.20 
  Rasa, Gints 2039 LAT1.0010.28205.60 
  Jankovskis, Guntis 2279 LAT0.001-0.3920-7.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office