Rapid: Individual Calculations January 2019
 Horobrijs, Daniils  Total change: -18.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 Latvian Chess Club Cup-2018 Riga LAT 2018-12-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1867 1876 1.50 7 -2.08 20 -41.60 
  Kane, Marta 1766 LAT0.001-0.6520-13.00 
  Tronenkovs, Valdis f2276  * LAT0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Strods, Kristaps Reinis 1578 LAT0.001-0.8520-17.00 
  Ozols, Andris 1536 LAT1.0010.12202.40 
  Ziedins, Roberts 1900 LAT0.001-0.4720-9.40 
  Auzins, Artis 2028 LAT0.001-0.3020-6.00 
  Krums, Ilmars 1985 LAT0.5010.15203.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Daugava Chess Christmas Rapid Tournament 2018 Daugavpils LAT 2018-12-23
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1828 1876 5.00 7 1.15 20 23.00 
  Ratnieks, Janis 1476  * LAT1.0010.08201.60 
  Dombrovska, Stefanija 1722 LAT1.0010.29205.80 
  Metreveli, Sergejs 2088 LAT0.001-0.2320-4.60 
  Matskevich, Maksim 1834 BLR0.501-0.0620-1.20 
  Novoksconovs, Vladimirs 1801 LAT1.0010.40208.00 
  Grizans, Arturs 1861 LAT1.0010.48209.60 
  Indricans, Vadims 2014 LAT0.5010.19203.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office