Rapid: Individual Calculations April 2018
 Francs, Marats  Total change: 22.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Latvian Championship Zemgale Regional Qualifier 2018 Jelgava LAT 2018-03-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1599 1354 2.50 6 1.17 20 23.40 
  Salenieks, Eduards 1754  * LAT0.5010.42208.40 
  Mednis, Agnis 1351 LAT0.5010.00200.00 
  Laksis, Ints 1549 LAT0.5010.25205.00 
  Mierins, Emils Janis 1502 LAT1.0010.702014.00 
  Zujevs, Valerijs 1754  * LAT0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Breikss, Peteris 1684 LAT0.001-0.1220-2.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Saulkrasti rapid chess championship 2018 Latvian master Janis Klavins memorial Saulkrasti LAT 2018-03-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1543 1354 2.00 7 -0.07 20 -1.40 
  Alipovs, Anatoljs 1754  * LAT0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Kenins, Bruno 1701 LAT0.001-0.1120-2.20 
  Burkevica, Ilze 1689 LAT0.001-0.1220-2.40 
  Maklakova, Naomi 1150 LAT1.0010.24204.80 
  Susejs, Voldemars 1590 LAT0.001-0.2020-4.00 
  Zareckis, Daniels 1204 LAT1.0010.30206.00 
  Osobskaja, Zinaida 1713 LAT0.001-0.1020-2.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office