Individual Calculations September 2021
 Kuznecova, Marija  Total change: 38.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Rudaga Kaissa 2021 STANDART Jurmala LAT 2021-07-26
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1624 1755 3.00 5 -0.21 40 -8.40 
  Varpins, Kristians 1355  * LAT1.0010.08403.20 
  Derbenev, Arseniy 1447 LAT1.0010.14405.60 
  Aminovs, Maksims 1595 LAT1.0010.294011.60 
  Shturman, Arseniy 1953 RUS0.001-0.2440-9.60 
  Jaakkola, Niklas 1770 FIN0.001-0.4840-19.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Riga Technical University Open 2021 - Tournament A Riga LAT 2021-08-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2001 1755 3.00 9 1.17 40 46.80 
  Olde, Margareth wf2155  * EST0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Wenzel, Birger 2034 GER0.001-0.1640-6.40 
  Saveljevs, Aleksandrs 2047 LAT1.0010.854034.00 
  Aarav, Dengla 2010 IND0.001-0.1940-7.60 
  Lohia, Sohum 1994 ENG0.001-0.2040-8.00 
  Gudovskis, Konstantins 2051 LAT0.001-0.1540-6.00 
  Chaillou, Thibault 1885 FRA1.0010.684027.20 
  Alainis, Artis 1841 LAT0.001-0.3840-15.20 
  Spiesberger, Gerhard 1992 AUT1.0010.804032.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office