Individual Calculations April 2016
 Najafi Khaniabadi, Kiarash  Total change: -16.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Iran Boys Under 16 Championship 2016 Tehran IRI 2016-02-27
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1947 1870 4.00 7 1.13 40 45.20 
  Fendereski, Nima 2255 IRI0.001-0.0940-3.60 
  Molaei, Mohammadamin 2230 IRI1.0010.904036.00 
  Khadem Erfani, Sobhan 1900 IRI0.001-0.4640-18.40 
  Mahdavi, Hassan 2089 IRI0.001-0.2240-8.80 
  Ghafari, Payman 1470  * IRI1.0010.08403.20 
  Kazerooni, Shahriar 1872 IRI1.0010.504020.00 
  Hoseini, S.alireza 1811 IRI1.0010.424016.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 "Novruz-2016" Intrl RT (classic) Baku AZE 2016-03-21
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1665 1870 3.50 7 -1.54 40 -61.60 
  Teymurov, Elnur 1614 AZE1.0010.19407.60 
  Akbarov, Aydin 1470  * AZE1.0010.08403.20 
  Rzayev, Chingiz 2027 AZE0.001-0.2940-11.60 
  Rzali, Sabina wc1667 AZE0.001-0.7640-30.40 
  Asgharzadeh, Mitra 1918 IRI0.001-0.4340-17.20 
  Khaledi, Omid 1489 IRI0.501-0.4140-16.40 
  Feyzullayeva, Shabnam 1470  * AZE1.0010.08403.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office