Rapid: Individual Calculations June 2023
 Sakinis, Robertas  Total change: -43.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Vilnius Eldership League 2023 Stage 2 Vilnius LTU 2023-05-11
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1711 1913 5.00 7 -0.09 20 -1.80 
  Zumeris, Marius 1513  * LTU1.0010.08201.60 
  Krukovskij, Vitalij 1539 LTU1.0010.10202.00 
  Nainys, Zanas 1962 LTU0.001-0.4320-8.60 
  Ribinskas, Gediminas 1691 LTU0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Michailovas, Ugnius 1635 LTU1.0010.17203.40 
  Voronov, Vadim 1701 LTU1.0010.23204.60 
  Valantiejus, Vaidotas 1939 LTU0.5010.04200.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Vilnius Eldership League 2023 Stage 3 Vilnius LTU 2023-05-25
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1568 1913 4.00 7 -2.06 20 -41.20 
  Krusas, Algirdas 1436 LTU0.501-0.4520-9.00 
  Sosunov, Nikita 1513  * LTU1.0010.08201.60 
  Kontenis, Andrius 1800 LTU0.001-0.6520-13.00 
  Matulaitis, Vidmantas 1519 LTU1.0010.08201.60 
  Sakinis, Rokas 1457 LTU0.501-0.4420-8.80 
  Kavalnis, Rytis 1614 LTU1.0010.15203.00 
  Michailovas, Ugnius 1635 LTU0.001-0.8320-16.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office