Blitz: Individual Calculations March 2018
 Thomsen, Martin  Total change: 9.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 Chess House Super Lyn februar 2018 Aarhus DEN 2018-02-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1794 1491 1.50 7 0.29 20 5.80 
  Grove, Peter 1891  * DEN0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Hemdorff, Dennis 1891  * DEN0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Oehlerich, Per 1891  * DEN0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  David, Anton 1776 DEN0.001-0.1620-3.20 
  Iversen, Flemming Pagh 1758 DEN1.0010.822016.40 
  Werk, Christian 1457 DEN0.501-0.0520-1.00 
  Boe, Mads f1891  * DEN0.001-0.0820-1.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Chess House Super Lyn februar 2018-4 Aarhus DEN 2018-02-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1636 1491 2.50 7 0.19 20 3.80 
  Olsen, Lars Peter Levin 1147 DEN1.0010.12202.40 
  Petersen, Jan Han 1830 DEN1.0010.882017.60 
  David, Anton 1776 DEN0.001-0.1620-3.20 
  Werk, Christian 1457 DEN0.501-0.0520-1.00 
  Christensen, John Christopher Ho 1648 DEN0.001-0.2920-5.80 
  Hemdorff, Dennis 1891  * DEN0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Overgaard, Jorgen 1705 DEN0.001-0.2320-4.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office