Individual Calculations September 2011
 Kovachev, Daniel Jakobsen  Total change: 17.25  Rating chartPersonal card
 Sveins 4. memorial Oslo NOR 2011-06-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2299 2315 4.50 8 0.40 15 6.00 
  Moe, Pal 1915  * NOR1.0010.08151.20 
  Urkedal, Frode m2448 NOR0.5010.18152.70 
  Berg, Emanuel g2608 SWE0.001-0.1515-2.25 
  Lund, Terje 2075 NOR1.0010.20153.00 
  Haubro, Sigfred 2149 DEN0.501-0.2215-3.30 
  Mellem, Nicolas A. 2113 NOR1.0010.24153.60 
  Hebden, Mark L g2539 ENG0.5010.28154.20 
  Hillarp Persson, Tiger g2543 SWE0.001-0.2115-3.15 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Norwegian Championship Elite Oslo NOR 2011-07-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2418 2315 4.00 9 0.75 15 11.25 
  Elsness, Frode m2485 NOR1.0010.721510.80 
  Ostenstad, Berge g2462 NOR0.5010.20153.00 
  Getz, Nicolai f2385 NOR0.5010.10151.50 
  Urkedal, Frode m2448 NOR0.5010.18152.70 
  Smith, Axel m2465 SWE0.5010.20153.00 
  Tjolsen, Katrine wm2225 NOR1.0010.38155.70 
  Johannessen, Leif Erlend g2496 NOR0.001-0.2615-3.90 
  Djurhuus, Rune g2461 NOR0.001-0.3015-4.50 
  Moen, Andreas f2333 NOR0.001-0.4715-7.05 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office