Individual Calculations November 2017
 Haugsrud, Hakon  Total change: -3.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 XIV Open Internacional Amateur de Calvia Palmanova - Calvia ESP 2017-10-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1926 1936 5.50 9 0.98 20 19.60 
  Courthaudon, Philippe 1536  * FRA1.0010.08201.60 
  Cip, Dalibor 2168 CZE0.001-0.2120-4.20 
  Blanco Blanco, Jesus 1752 ESP1.0010.26205.20 
  Aasen, Kjetil Myrlid 1781 NOR0.501-0.2120-4.20 
  Spence, David J 2156 ENG0.5010.28205.60 
  Gaitan Moyano, Juan 2013 ESP1.0010.612012.20 
  Pons Morro, Mateo 2122 ESP0.5010.24204.80 
  Lacrosse, Marc f2121 BEL0.001-0.2620-5.20 
  Baldo Company, Jordi 1689 ESP1.0010.19203.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Lillehammer GP A 2017 Lillehammer NOR 2017-10-27
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1821 1936 2.00 5 -1.15 20 -23.00 
  Flatebo, Hallvard Haug 1536  * NOR1.0010.08201.60 
  Kvisla, Johannes Luangtep f2256 NOR0.001-0.1320-2.60 
  Bo, Martin 1685 NOR0.501-0.3120-6.20 
  Pronstad, Thomas 1956 NOR0.001-0.4720-9.40 
  Dahl, Max 1670 NOR0.501-0.3220-6.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office