Individual Calculations September 2017
 Kainz, Josef  Total change: 65.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 33. FAAKER SEE OPEN 2017 Latschach AUT 2017-08-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1879 1832 4.00 8 0.51 20 10.20 
  Ivanusa, Blaz 2089 SLO0.5010.32206.40 
  Verhoef, Helge 2083 GER0.001-0.1920-3.80 
  Baronbeck, Johann 1661 AUT1.0010.27205.40 
  Jakob, Matthias 2028 GER0.001-0.2520-5.00 
  Katter, Katharina 1470 AUT1.0010.10202.00 
  Hoebarth, Guenter 1968 AUT0.5010.18203.60 
  Skok, Joze 2010 SLO0.001-0.2720-5.40 
  Melcher, Jakob 1724 AUT1.0010.35207.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 26. Int. Open Feffernitz 2017 Feffernitz AUT 2017-08-20
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1936 1832 6.00 9 2.74 20 54.80 
  Liotta, Marcel 1432  * AUT1.0010.08201.60 
  Rechberger, Franz 2129 AUT0.5010.35207.00 
  Birkenmaier, Rainer 2090 GER0.001-0.1820-3.60 
  Doujak, Gabriel Andreas 1673 AUT1.0010.29205.80 
  Kock, Hans-Uwe f1979 LIE1.0010.702014.00 
  Kobas, Mihael 1982 CRO0.001-0.3020-6.00 
  Hoenick, Andreas c2118 GER0.5010.34206.80 
  Frey, Armin 1961 AUT1.0010.672013.40 
  Keck, Ingolf 2064 GER1.0010.792015.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office