Individual Calculations April 2018
 Lindblom, Peter  Total change: -35.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Div II 3 2017-18 R567 Sweden SWE 2018-01-13
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1938 1995 1.50 3 -0.23 20 -4.60 
  Borg, Mats 1937 SWE0.501-0.0820-1.60 
  Forsslund, Jonas 1837 SWE1.0010.29205.80 
  Sollerman, Mattias 2040 SWE0.001-0.4420-8.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Sallskapets Schweizer-KM 2018 R34 stockholm SWE 2018-02-06
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1837 2008 0.50 2 -0.95 20 -19.00 
  Gundersen, Ingvar 1886 SWE0.001-0.6720-13.40 
  Shwan Kurdi, Mir 1788 SWE0.501-0.2820-5.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Sallskapets Schweizer-KM 2018 R56 stockholm SWE 2018-03-06
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1744 1988 1.00 2 -0.59 20 -11.80 
  Sandstrom, Fredrik 1665 SWE0.501-0.3720-7.40 
  Sandberg, Philip 1823 SWE0.501-0.2220-4.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office