Individual Calculations September 2015
 De Sousa Da Silva, Armando  Total change: -15.80  Rating chartPersonal card
 III Torneio Internacional Cidade de Famalicao Famalicao POR 2015-08-02
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1859 1958 2.50 5 -0.50 20 -10.00 
  Martins, Goncalo Faria Oliveira 1567 POR1.0010.09201.80 
  Padeiro, Jose f2285 POR0.001-0.1320-2.60 
  Silva, Ana Ines Teixeira Da 1741 POR0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Kambuadi, Aires 1558  * ANG1.0010.08201.60 
  Guimaraes, Rui 2144 POR0.001-0.2620-5.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 II Ab Intl "Hotel CEMAR" Mondariz Balneario - Spain ESP 2015-08-16
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1919 1958 3.50 7 -0.29 20 -5.80 
  Rodriguez Lopez, Rafael m2255 ESP0.001-0.1520-3.00 
  Meira Iglesias, Alejandro 1773 ESP0.501-0.2420-4.80 
  Gomez Fernandez, Pedro Javier 1558  * ESP1.0010.08201.60 
  Buitron Ramil, David 1641 ESP0.501-0.3720-7.40 
  Salgado Gonzalez, Julio 1801 ESP1.0010.29205.80 
  Lorenzo Duran, Marcos 2160 ESP0.5010.26205.20 
  Sande Edreira, Jose Antonio f2244 ESP0.001-0.1620-3.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office