Individual Calculations March 2017 |
|
|
Schalkx, Johnny Total change: 6.00 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 6 | Various places | BEL | 2017-01-29 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2045 | 2157 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.15 | 20 | -3.00 | |
| Hawinkel, Stijn | | | 2045 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.15 | 20 | -3.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 7 | Various places | BEL | 2017-02-12 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2008 | 2157 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.30 | 20 | 6.00 | |
| Dugailliez, Guy | | | 2008 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.30 | 20 | 6.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2016-2017 Round 8 | Various places | BEL | 2017-02-19 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2267 | 2157 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.15 | 20 | 3.00 | |
| Schoemans, Roy | | | 2267 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | 0.15 | 20 | 3.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|