Individual Calculations November 2013 |
|
|
Daces, Philippe Total change: -8.55 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 1 | Various | BEL | 2013-09-22 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2001 | 2009 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.01 | 15 | -0.15 | |
| De Cauter, Wolfgang G. | | | 2001 | GER | 0.50 | 1 | -0.01 | 15 | -0.15 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 2 | Various | BEL | 2013-09-29 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1975 | 2009 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.55 | 15 | -8.25 | |
| Tuerlinckx, Ben | | | 1975 | BEL | 0.00 | 1 | -0.55 | 15 | -8.25 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 3 | Various | BEL | 2013-10-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2001 | 2009 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.01 | 15 | -0.15 | |
| Geuquet, Michael | | | 2001 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.01 | 15 | -0.15 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|