Individual Calculations March 2016 |
|
|
Hugaert, Arthur Total change: 4.40 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2015-2016 Round 6 | Various | BEL | 2016-01-31 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1943 | 2112 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.28 | 20 | 5.60 | |
| De Weird, Matthias | | | 1943 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.28 | 20 | 5.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Dutch Team Competition 2015-2016 - 2D - round 6 | Various | NED | 2016-02-13 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2162 | 2122 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.44 | 20 | -8.80 | |
| Eikelboom, Berend | | | 2162 | NED | 0.00 | 1 | -0.44 | 20 | -8.80 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2015-2016 Round 7 | Various | BEL | 2016-02-21 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2038 | 2122 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 20 | 7.60 | |
| Mangelschots, Peter | | | 2038 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 20 | 7.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|