Individual Calculations January 2014 |
|
|
Van Houtte, Randy Total change: -2.25 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 4 | Various | BEL | 2013-11-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1748 | 1952 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.76 | 15 | -11.40 | |
| Willems, Chris | | | 1748 | BEL | 0.00 | 1 | -0.76 | 15 | -11.40 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Rounds 5-6 | Various | BEL | 2013-12-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1854 | 1947 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.13 | 15 | -1.95 | |
| Logie, Bernard | | | 1854 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.13 | 15 | -1.95 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Dutch Team Competiton 13-14 - 3F - round 3 | Several | NED | 2013-12-07 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2130 | 1947 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.74 | 15 | 11.10 | |
| Van Keulen, Rob | | | 2130 | NED | 1.00 | 1 | 0.74 | 15 | 11.10 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|