Individual Calculations April 2022 |
|
|
Bauwens, Steven Total change: 4.60 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2021-2022 Round 9 | Various Places | BEL | 2022-03-13 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1647 | 1738 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 20 | 7.60 | |
| Grootaert, Luc | | | 1647 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 20 | 7.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2021-2022 Round 4 | Various Places | BEL | 2022-03-20 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1867 | 1738 | 0.00 | 1 | -0.33 | 20 | -6.60 | |
| Lachaert, Tibo | | | 1867 | BEL | 0.00 | 1 | -0.33 | 20 | -6.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2021-2022 Round 10 | Various Places | BEL | 2022-03-27 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1472 | 1738 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.18 | 20 | 3.60 | |
| Claeys, Patrick | | | 1472 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.18 | 20 | 3.60 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|