Individual Calculations September 2022
 Pejrimovsky, Tadeas Rubel  Total change: 2.28  Rating chartPersonal card
 CZECH OPEN 2022 - B - open rating tournament Pardubice CZE 2022-07-23
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1749 1716 4.00 9 -0.15 38 -5.70 
  Pfeufer, Lion 2030 GER0.001-0.1438-5.32 
  Kubes, Patrik 1459 CZE0.001-0.8238-31.16 
  Nespurek, Jan 1571 CZE1.0010.313811.78 
  Maklakova, Naomi 1548 LAT0.501-0.2238-8.36 
  Vosmik, Matej 1505 CZE1.0010.23388.74 
  Balazec, Ludovit 1930 CZE1.0010.773829.26 
  Jasso, Matej 1873 CZE0.5010.21387.98 
  Auwens, Michel 1864 NED0.001-0.3038-11.40 
  Wesslen, Ulf 1962 SWE0.001-0.1938-7.22 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 SUMMER PRAGUE OPEN 2022 - A - IM open Prague CZE 2022-08-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1870 1716 3.00 9 0.21 38 7.98 
  Valkova, Angelika 2075 UKR0.001-0.1038-3.80 
  Dylag, Emilia wf1953 POL0.001-0.2038-7.60 
  Pick, Stepan 1929 CZE0.001-0.2338-8.74 
  Juhanak, Daniel 1881 CZE0.001-0.2838-10.64 
  Dranka, Jowita 1535 POL0.501-0.2438-9.12 
  Cieslak, Leszek 1784 CZE1.0010.593822.42 
  Machala, Vladislav 1931 CZE1.0010.773829.26 
  Ahmed, Fareed f1920 UAE0.001-0.2438-9.12 
  Tardi, Oscar 1819 FRA0.5010.14385.32 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office