Individual Calculations November 2013 |
|
|
Charlier, Christophe Total change: 34.50 | | |
|
Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 1 | Various | BEL | 2013-09-22 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1724 | 1868 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.31 | 30 | 9.30 | |
| Zagozen, Franz | | | 1724 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.31 | 30 | 9.30 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 2 | Various | BEL | 2013-09-29 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1849 | 1868 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.47 | 30 | 14.10 | |
| Chung Choong Lon, Marc | | | 1849 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.47 | 30 | 14.10 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Belgian Interclubs 2013-2014 Round 3 | Various | BEL | 2013-10-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
1772 | 1868 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.37 | 30 | 11.10 | |
| Debusschere, Helmuth | | | 1772 | BEL | 1.00 | 1 | 0.37 | 30 | 11.10 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|