Individual Calculations December 2016
 Audi, Saiesh  Total change: 75.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 5th National Amateur Chess Championship (Below 2300) Mumbai IND 2016-11-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1492 1377 5.00 10 1.36 40 54.40 
  Ajinkya, Pingale 1749 IND0.001-0.1040-4.00 
  Nikam, Akanksha 1026 IND1.0010.11404.40 
  Roneet, Das 1658 IND1.0010.844033.60 
  Sivasubramanian, R 1658 IND0.001-0.1640-6.40 
  Bandekar, Aditya 1644 IND0.001-0.1840-7.20 
  Mali, Nilesh 1151 IND1.0010.21408.40 
  Kandke, Sachin 1662 IND1.0010.844033.60 
  Joglekar, Abhijit 1658 IND0.001-0.1640-6.40 
  Kunnekar, Vanshri 1125 IND1.0010.19407.60 
  Spandan, P Seth 1586 IND0.001-0.2340-9.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Morphy Open FIDE Rating Chess tmt Nashik IND 2016-11-12
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1610 1377 2.00 6 0.53 40 21.20 
  Boricha, Ketan 1777  * IND0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Rathi, Dhanashree 1743 IND1.0010.904036.00 
  Dere, Pushkar 1715 IND0.001-0.1240-4.80 
  Mahindrakar, Indrajeet 1777  * IND0.001-0.0840-3.20 
  Thakur, Chaitanya 1034 IND1.0010.12404.80 
  Nakul, Chaudhary 1612 IND0.001-0.2140-8.40 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office