Individual Calculations July 2011 |
|
|
Shah, Shilpa Total change: 0.00 | | |
|
FIDE rating chess tmt for mumbai players only | Mumbai | IND | 2011-04-26 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | Rp | K | K*chg | Game |
1362 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 662 | | 0.00 | |
| Jadhav, Vaibhavi | | | 1362 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | A2H 05th All India FIDE Rating below 1600 | Hyderabad | IND | 2011-05-14 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | Rp | K | K*chg | Game |
1310 | 0 | 0.50 | 1 | 0.00 | 1310 | | 0.00 | |
| Pawan, Kaushik | | | 1310 | IND | 0.50 | 1 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | A2H 06th All India FIDE Rating below 2100 | Hyderabad | IND | 2011-05-17 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | Rp | K | K*chg | Game |
1496 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 796 | | 0.00 | |
| Anigani, Kavya | | | 1496 | IND | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|