Individual Calculations July 2013
 Sayantan, Sarkar  Total change: 78.15  Rating chartPersonal card
 51 West Bengal State Chess Championship Kolkata IND 2013-06-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1698 1381 3.50 8 2.39 30 71.70 
  Saptorshi, Gupta 1775 IND0.5010.423012.60 
  Ritam, Ghosh 1613 IND1.0010.793023.70 
  Subhayan, Kundu 1781  * IND0.5010.423012.60 
  Roy, Pallabi 1781  * IND0.001-0.0830-2.40 
  Swapan, Kumar Das 1643 IND1.0010.823024.60 
  Satya, Sekhar Mitra 1713 IND0.001-0.1230-3.60 
  Subham, Saha 1628 IND0.5010.31309.30 
  Avijaan, Roy Choudhury 1649 IND0.001-0.1730-5.10 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
NOTE: K factor changed
 1st HDCA International FIDE Rated Schools Open Chess Tournament,2013 Kolkata, West Bengal IND 2013-06-08
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1621 1381 1.50 5 0.43 15 6.45 
  Debarshi, Mukherjee 1781  * IND0.001-0.0815-1.20 
  Angira, Choudhuri 1553 IND0.5010.23153.45 
  Sourav, Mondal 1550 IND0.5010.22153.30 
  Khushi, Dharewa 1700 IND0.001-0.1315-1.95 
  Swapnadip, Haldar 1521 IND0.5010.19152.85 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office