Individual Calculations December 2017
 Nitish, Das  Total change: 95.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 6th National Amateur Chess Championship 2017 New Delhi IND 2017-11-05
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1831 1844 7.50 11 1.94 40 77.60 
  Veer, Bhan Harsh 1444  * IND1.0010.08403.20 
  Harshiel, Sehgal 1536 IND1.0010.14405.60 
  Narayan, Joshi 1511 IND1.0010.12404.80 
  Jaiswal, Puneet 2207 IND1.0010.904036.00 
  Soham, Kamotra 1973 IND1.0010.674026.80 
  Kushagra, Mohan c2160 IND0.001-0.1340-5.20 
  Thanki, Hemal Karsanji 2103 IND0.5010.324012.80 
  Sudhanshu, Ranjan 2026 IND0.5010.24409.60 
  Saksham, Rautela 1959 IND0.001-0.3440-13.60 
  Manish, Kumar (2006) 1710 IND0.501-0.1840-7.20 
  Mohit, Kumar Soni 1508 IND1.0010.12404.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 2nd ASOM FIDE Rating open Chess Tmt Assam IND 2017-11-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1652 1844 2.50 3 0.44 40 17.60 
  Rajdeep, Mudiar 1444  * IND1.0010.08403.20 
  Mayank, Chakraborty 1444  * IND1.0010.08403.20 
  Apollosana Mangang, Rajkumar 2067 IND0.5010.284011.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office