Rapid: Individual Calculations November 2017
 Suvorov, Nikolaj  Total change: -15.20  Rating chartPersonal card
 Kirov_Seniors Rapid 2017 Kirov RUS 2017-10-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1614 1503 3.50 8 0.61 20 12.20 
  Novoselov, Lev 1720 RUS0.001-0.2220-4.40 
  Garipov, Zufar 1782 RUS0.001-0.1620-3.20 
  Rylov, Yrij 1420 RUS0.501-0.1120-2.20 
  Kokovikhin, Vladimir 1443 RUS1.0010.42208.40 
  Gorodilov, Vladimir 1609 RUS1.0010.642012.80 
  Golovin, Vladimir 1766 RUS0.001-0.1820-3.60 
  Hudoshubin, Valentin 1621 RUS1.0010.662013.20 
  Terentiev, Vladimir 1548 RUS0.001-0.4420-8.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Kirov region Champ Rapid 2017 Kirov RUS 2017-10-15
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1523 1503 2.50 8 -1.37 20 -27.40 
  Dvinskikh, Leonid 1903  * RUS0.001-0.0820-1.60 
  Vinogradov, Alexander 1259 RUS1.0010.20204.00 
  Bogdan, Evgenij 1737 RUS0.001-0.2120-4.20 
  Korovyakovskij, Nikita 1174 RUS1.0010.12202.40 
  Evtukhov, Lev 1690 RUS0.001-0.2620-5.20 
  Golovin, Vladimir 1766 RUS0.001-0.1820-3.60 
  Grel, Alina 1346 RUS0.501-0.2120-4.20 
  Pushkarev, Alexander 1311 RUS0.001-0.7520-15.00 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office