Individual Calculations November 2016
 Lojek, Marek  Total change: -24.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 Extraliga dorostu - vychod 2016/2017 r1-4 various CZE 2016-10-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2057 2110 2.50 4 0.18 40 7.20 
  Bulockin, Martin 1934 CZE1.0010.274010.80 
  Vykouk, Jan f2428 CZE0.001-0.1340-5.20 
  Marko, Daniel 1949 CZE0.501-0.2140-8.40 
  Tulis, Jan 1917 CZE1.0010.254010.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Krajska soutez MKSS B 2016/2017 r1-2 various CZE 2016-10-09
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2001 2110 1.00 2 -0.30 40 -12.00 
  Cudnik, Andrzej 2031 POL1.0010.394015.60 
  Beluska, Tereza 1970 CZE0.001-0.6940-27.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Krajsky prebor MKSS 2016/2017 r1 various CZE 2016-10-16
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2123 2110 0.00 1 -0.48 40 -19.20 
  Omamik, Pavel 2123 CZE0.001-0.4840-19.20 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office