Individual Calculations July 2009
 Vargas, Gabriela  Total change: 1.95  Rating chartPersonal card
 5to Sudamericano Sub - 20 Femenino Cochabamba BOL 2009-04-08
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1982 2090 5.50 8 0.40 15 6.00 
  Estrada, Lucia wc1887 BOL0.001-0.7615-11.40 
  Heredia Serrano, Carla 2098 ECU0.5010.01150.15 
  Orejuela Chango, Paulina 1887 ECU1.0010.24153.60 
  Cordero, Daniela 1969 BOL1.0010.34155.10 
  Feliciano, Vanessa wf2112 BRA1.0010.53157.95 
  Romero Echeverria, Abigail 2057 ECU1.0010.45156.75 
  Borda, Carla wc2022 BOL0.001-0.5915-8.85 
  Mendoza, Samanta 1827 BOL1.0010.18152.70 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Torneo Zonal 2.5 Femenino Asuncion PAR 2009-06-10
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2057 2090 4.50 9 -0.27 15 -4.05 
  Quinones Mena, Jeannette 2020 CHI1.0010.40156.00 
  Lujan, Carolina mwg2360 ARG0.001-0.1715-2.55 
  Fernandez, Maria Florencia 2105 ARG1.0010.52157.80 
  Zuriel, Marisa wm2201 ARG0.001-0.3515-5.25 
  Perez, Dalila 1740 PAR1.0010.11151.65 
  Avalos, Leticia wc1740 PAR1.0010.11151.65 
  Colombo, Camila wf2090 URU0.001-0.5015-7.50 
  Nejanky, Maisa 2100 ARG0.5010.01150.15 
  Plazaola, Maria De Los Angeles wf2160 ARG0.001-0.4015-6.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office