Individual Calculations November 2022
 Burnett, Jim  Total change: -37.80  Rating chartPersonal card
 59th Hull Congress Open Hull ENG 2022-10-14
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1848 2084 2.00 5 -1.95 20 -39.00 
  Carmichael, Ned 1866 ENG0.501-0.2820-5.60 
  Zhu, Yaoyao 1909 ENG0.501-0.2320-4.60 
  Brencher, Paul 1898 ENG0.501-0.2420-4.80 
  Larchikov, Maksym 1721 UKR0.001-0.9020-18.00 
  Gillespie, David P 1847 SCO0.501-0.3020-6.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 2022/23 4NCL Division 1 Rounds 1-2 Daventry ENG 2022-10-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2357 2084 0.00 1 -0.17 20 -3.40 
  Ashton, Adam G f2357 ENG0.001-0.1720-3.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 2022/23 4NCL Division 3 West Rounds 1-2 Daventry ENG 2022-10-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1873 2084 1.00 1 0.23 20 4.60 
  Kirupakaran, Vishnu 1873 ENG1.0010.23204.60 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office