Individual Calculations September 2011
 Mishuchkov, Nikolai  Total change: -9.30  Rating chartPersonal card
 Czech Open 2011 - A - GM open Pardubice CZE 2011-07-22
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2250 2421 5.00 9 -1.53 10 -15.30 
  Engelmann, Jakob 2213 GER0.001-0.7710-7.70 
  Lyell, Mark f2224 ENG0.501-0.2510-2.50 
  Zwardon, Vojtech 2231 CZE0.501-0.2510-2.50 
  Oresky, Jan 2223 CZE1.0010.24102.40 
  Adamek, Jiri 2289 CZE0.501-0.1810-1.80 
  Varitski, Igor m2273 UKR1.0010.30103.00 
  Majer, Jiri f2217 CZE0.501-0.2610-2.60 
  Boruchovsky, Avital 2297 ISR0.501-0.1710-1.70 
  Havlikova, Kristyna wm2280 CZE0.501-0.1910-1.90 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Olomouc Chess Summer 2011 - B2 - IM tournament Olomouc CZE 2011-08-03
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2258 2421 7.00 9 0.60 10 6.00 
  Groetz, Harald m2256 AUT0.501-0.2210-2.20 
  Ruzicka, Petr f2271 CZE1.0010.30103.00 
  Vrana, Jan f2306 CZE1.0010.34103.40 
  Aripov, Iskandar 2124 UZB1.0010.15101.50 
  Michalczak, Thomas f2325 GER0.501-0.1310-1.30 
  Volodin, Viktor m2200 RUS0.501-0.2810-2.80 
  Balacek, Tadeas c2251 CZE1.0010.28102.80 
  Mackowiak, Marek 2236 POL1.0010.26102.60 
  Klima, Lukas m2349 CZE0.501-0.1010-1.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office