Individual Calculations September 2009
 Holvason, Juri  Total change: 11.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Czech Open 2009 B - Tchibo Open Pardubice CZE 2009-07-24
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2050 2118 5.00 9 -0.29 15 -4.35 
  Schuetz, Peter 1940 SVK1.0010.27154.05 
  Rogalski, Krzysztof 1937 POL0.501-0.2415-3.60 
  Segerberg, Tomas 1941 GER1.0010.27154.05 
  Ter-Karapetian, Alex 2191 GEO0.001-0.4015-6.00 
  Vachtfeidl, Petr 2002 CZE1.0010.34155.10 
  Bar, Aviv 1896 ISR1.0010.22153.30 
  Golcman, Evgeny 2304 RUS0.5010.24153.60 
  Spence, David 2221 ENG0.001-0.3615-5.40 
  Bertrand, Quentin 2020 FRA0.001-0.6315-9.45 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Manhem Chess Week IM 2009 Gothenburg SWE 2009-08-01
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 2353 2118 3.00 9 1.05 15 15.75 
  Nithander, Victor f2422 SWE0.5010.36155.40 
  Lund, Esben m2412 DEN0.001-0.1515-2.25 
  Carlhammar, Magnus f2352 SWE0.001-0.2115-3.15 
  Wengholm, Anders 2175 SWE1.0010.58158.70 
  Moberg, Karl Johan m2277 SWE0.5010.21153.15 
  Svensson, Bengt m2389 SWE0.001-0.1715-2.55 
  Kockum, Anton Frisk 2253 SWE1.0010.681510.20 
  Figura, Atila Gajo f2436 GER0.001-0.1315-1.95 
  Glud, Jakob Vang m2462 DEN0.001-0.1215-1.80 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office