Individual Calculations January 2017 |
|
|
Dresen, Ulrich Total change: 1.40 | | |
|
NRW-Klasse 2 2016/2017 November 2016 | Duesseldorf | GER | 2016-11-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2095 | 2192 | 1.00 | 1 | 0.37 | 20 | 7.40 | |
| Mueller, Achim | | | 2095 | GER | 1.00 | 1 | 0.37 | 20 | 7.40 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | NRW-Klasse 2 2016/2017 December 2016 | Duesseldorf | GER | 2016-12-01 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2058 | 2208 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.20 | 20 | -4.00 | |
| Haude, Ruediger | | | 2058 | GER | 0.50 | 1 | -0.20 | 20 | -4.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | | Dutch Team Competition 2016-2017 2D Round 5 | Various | NED | 2016-12-17 |
Rc | Ro | w | n | change | K | K*chg | Game |
2137 | 2208 | 0.50 | 1 | -0.10 | 20 | -2.00 | |
| Ghyselen, Wouter | | | 2137 | BEL | 0.50 | 1 | -0.10 | 20 | -2.00 | | Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change) | |
|
« go back
|
Share this page
|
|
© World Chess Federation
| Contact us: admin@fide.com
| Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office
| Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office
|