Blitz: Individual Calculations July 2015
 Boldoo, Erdenepurev  Total change: -14.60  Rating chartPersonal card
 11th Asian Schools Chess Championships 2015 - Blitz Open Under-17 Singapore SGP 2015-06-04
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1908 2064 5.00 6 0.88 20 17.60 
  Kenenbaev, Aidar 1675 KGZ1.0010.09201.80 
  Ng, Wee Hong Brendan 1803 SIN1.0010.18203.60 
  Isaev, Chingys 1959 KGZ0.001-0.6420-12.80 
  Bersamina, Paulo m2338 PHI1.0010.832016.60 
  Yang, Ching Wei, Austin f1826 TPE1.0010.20204.00 
  Varma, Shabdhik 1845 IND1.0010.22204.40 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 16th Asean+ Age Group Chess Championships 2015 - Blitz Open Under-16 Singapore SGP 2015-06-16
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1945 2064 3.50 8 -1.61 20 -32.20 
  Lau, Xian Hui Rudolph 1664  * SIN1.0010.08201.60 
  Jacutina, John Merill 1835 PHI0.001-0.7920-15.80 
  Truong, Anh Kiet 1786 VIE1.0010.17203.40 
  Nguyen, Tan Hoang Nam c1891 VIE0.501-0.2320-4.60 
  Tran, Minh Thang c2233 VIE0.001-0.2820-5.60 
  Tin, Jingyao f2311 SIN0.001-0.1920-3.80 
  Manan, Rai 1967 IND1.0010.37207.40 
  Nguyen, Dang Hong Phuc 1876 VIE0.001-0.7420-14.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office