Blitz: Individual Calculations January 2022
 Pandit, Kabir  Total change: 0.00  Rating chartPersonal card
 2021 London Chess Classic Blitz 4 London ENG 2021-12-11
RcRownchangeRpKK*chgGame
 1792 0 6.50 10 0.00 1822   0.00 
  Seet, Joshua 1302 ENG0.5010.00 0.00 
  Chatterjee, Sagnik 1452 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Ismail, Mohammed Aayan 1673 ENG0.0010.00 0.00 
  Zapolskis, Antanas m2232 LTU0.0010.00 0.00 
  Badacsonyi, Frankie 1506 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Dunn, Maxim 1758 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Muskath, Maximillian 1834 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Lalic, Peter D 2163 ENG0.0010.00 0.00 
  Stojanas, Justinas 2101 LTU1.0010.00 0.00 
  Pollack, Oscar 1900 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 13th Richmond Blitz Blast - "Rik Thomas Memorial" London ENG 2021-12-18
RcRownchangeRpKK*chgGame
 1856 0 4.00 8 0.00 1856   0.00 
  Grieve, Harry f2208 ENG0.0010.00 0.00 
  Petrov, Vladimir Sergeev m2154 BUL0.0010.00 0.00 
  Singhal, Siddhant 1448 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Eames, Robert S f2103 ENG0.0010.00 0.00 
  Chatterjee, Sagnik 1452 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Finn, Peter 1973 ENG0.0010.00 0.00 
  Davey, Mark 1970 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 
  Cordova-Lopez, Diego Anton 1541 ENG1.0010.00 0.00 

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office