Individual Calculations March 2011
 Lohana, Kapil  Total change: -7.50  Rating chartPersonal card
 09th International Open Chess tmt - 2011 New Delhi IND 2011-01-07
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1988 2070 6.00 11 -0.38 15 -5.70 
  Stuti, Dewan 1670  * IND1.0010.08151.20 
  Pradeep, Kumar Nag 1725 IND1.0010.11151.65 
  Lenic, Luka g2470  * SLO0.001-0.0815-1.20 
  Mitrabha, Guha f1757 IND1.0010.14152.10 
  Zeng, Chongsheng 2377 CHN0.001-0.1415-2.10 
  Iqbal, Singh Gulati 1670  * IND1.0010.08151.20 
  Ramakrishna, J f2268 IND0.001-0.2415-3.60 
  Rahul, Lamba 1828 IND1.0010.20153.00 
  Mohammad, Javed f2238 BAN0.001-0.2815-4.20 
  Krishna Bhushan, Dlvnpss 1683 IND1.0010.09151.35 
  Prince, Bajaj c2186 IND0.001-0.3415-5.10 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 National Citites Nagpur IND 2011-01-31
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1695 2070 3.50 4 -0.12 15 -1.80 
  Tatiya, Neeti 1670  * IND1.0010.08151.20 
  Shevade, Rohan 1708 IND1.0010.10151.50 
  Raut, Vaibhav 1670  * IND1.0010.08151.20 
  Aditya, Anil Dixit 1730 IND0.501-0.3815-5.70 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office