Individual Calculations March 2012
 Nair, Sanjeev  Total change: 22.05  Rating chartPersonal card
 Maharashtra State Chess Championship Aurangabad IND 2011-11-06
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1760 1773 5.00 7 1.28 15 19.20 
  Rachure, Vishal S 1542 IND1.0010.21153.15 
  Tiwari, Amardeep 1951 IND0.001-0.2715-4.05 
  Kawade, Aryan H 1567 IND1.0010.24153.60 
  Patil, Mayur R 1690 IND1.0010.39155.85 
  Atharvaa, P 1717 IND1.0010.42156.30 
  Vinay, Vijaykumar 1679 IND1.0010.37155.55 
  Kulkarni, Chinmay 2173  * IND0.001-0.0815-1.20 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 IC School only for Mumbai Players Mumbai IND 2011-12-27
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1571 1773 6.00 8 0.19 15 2.85 
  Kushal, Kaushik Karelia 1389 IND1.0010.09151.35 
  Shah, Pujan 1570 IND0.001-0.7615-11.40 
  Meet, Puri 1373  * IND1.0010.08151.20 
  Sarvesh, Mahadeo Makane 1449 IND1.0010.13151.95 
  Mehta, Ashay 1434 IND1.0010.12151.80 
  Gajengi, Rajababu 1983 IND0.5010.27154.05 
  Gandhi, Jay 1739 IND0.501-0.0515-0.75 
  Malgaonkar, Bhushan 1633 IND1.0010.31154.65 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office