Blitz: Individual Calculations March 2022
 Gonzalez Guzman, Alicia Magali  Total change: 1.40  Rating chartPersonal card
 Torneo Acadfac Ciudad de Mexico MEX 2022-02-16
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1424 1654 4.50 6 -0.11 20 -2.20 
  Galindo Rosales, Ramses Ivan 1476 MEX1.0010.27205.40 
  Jimenez Rosas, Sandra Joana 1417 MEX0.501-0.3020-6.00 
  Del Razo Mendoza, Andrea Nikole 1541 MEX0.501-0.1520-3.00 
  Bautista Acquart, Itzya Esmeralda 1254  * MEX1.0010.08201.60 
  Perez Vazquez, Lourdes 1579 MEX0.501-0.1020-2.00 
  Perez Zamora, Frida Sarahi 1275 MEX1.0010.09201.80 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 
 Torneo Acadfac 2 Ciudad de Mexico MEX 2022-02-17
RcRownchangeKK*chgGame
 1509 1654 4.00 6 0.18 20 3.60 
  Luna Organista, Eunice 1143 MEX1.0010.04200.80 
  Perez Vazquez, Lourdes 1579 MEX1.0010.40208.00 
  Ortiz Ponce, Cristobal 1794 MEX0.001-0.3120-6.20 
  Galindo Rosales, Ramses Ivan 1476 MEX1.0010.27205.40 
  Ramirez Sanchez, Enrique 1806 MEX0.001-0.3020-6.00 
  Del Razo Garcia, Andres Jazhie 1254  * MEX1.0010.08201.60 
 * Rating difference of more than 400. Please read more at FIDE Handbook

Rc - average rating of rated opponents, Ro - rating of a player in a tournament, Rp - rating performance of an unrated player, W - points won in a tournament against rated opponents, N - total number of games against rated opponents, Change - change used for calculation according to formula, K - development coefficient, Kchg - rating change of a player calculated as (K * change)
 

 

« go back

Share this page


   facebook    twitter    gplus
©  World Chess Federation    |  Contact us: admin@fide.com   |  Developed and supported by Elista FIDE Office   |   Ratings questions: Elista FIDE Office